Bug#1041282: jtreg6 - okay to upload upstream version 6.2+1?

2023-08-20 Thread Vladimir Petko
Hi, Thank you!!! Yes, the patch is cumulative and contains all the relevant changes. Existing jtreg6 version (6.1+2-1~deb10u1) in buster is sufficient to rebuild openjdk-11 and -17 with a number of failing tests. If we update to 6.2, those tests should start passing, but the update is not

Bug#1041282: jtreg6 - okay to upload upstream version 6.2+1?

2023-08-20 Thread tony mancill
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 09:49:01AM +1200, Vladimir Petko wrote: > Hi, > > Upgrading to 6.2 does not introduce any jtreg regressions in > openjdk-11 and -17. Hi Vladimir, Thank you for your response. The upload is ready, but I want to check once more with the list whether there are any

Bug#1041282: jtreg6 - okay to upload upstream version 6.2+1?

2023-08-20 Thread Vladimir Petko
Hi, Upgrading to 6.2 does not introduce any jtreg regressions in openjdk-11 and -17. Best Regards, Vladimir. On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 7:06 AM tony mancill wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:28:39AM +1200, Vladimir Petko wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The build.xml is not supported by the

Bug#1041282: jtreg6 - okay to upload upstream version 6.2+1?

2023-08-18 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:28:39AM +1200, Vladimir Petko wrote: > Hi, > > The build.xml is not supported by the upstream, so I have updated the > patch to include rule changes to use the provided Makefile[1]. > > Changes: > * Use Makefile to build jtreg (LP: #2031041). > - Use --release