Bug#1056834: pyfuse3: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x

2023-12-11 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 12/11/23 13:08, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:30:24PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 12/11/23 12:04, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: Unfortunately pyfuse3 is currently not more actively developedi (see it's github page), I wonder if it makes sense

Bug#1056834: pyfuse3: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x

2023-12-11 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:30:24PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 12/11/23 12:04, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: Unfortunately pyfuse3 is currently not more actively developedi (see it's github page), I wonder if it makes sense maintaining it in Debian, even considering the Python life

Bug#1056834: pyfuse3: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x

2023-12-11 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 12/11/23 12:04, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: Unfortunately pyfuse3 is currently not more actively developedi (see it's github page), I wonder if it makes sense maintaining it in Debian, even considering the Python life cycle which far from being slow and could render the whole thing

Bug#1056834: pyfuse3: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x

2023-12-11 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
Hi folks, Unfortunately pyfuse3 is currently not more actively developedi (see it's github page), I wonder if it makes sense maintaining it in Debian, even considering the Python life cycle which far from being slow and could render the whole thing strongly obsolete even at mid-term. On Sun,

Bug#1056834: pyfuse3: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x

2023-12-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 patch On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 10:06:00 + Matthias Klose wrote: If the package cannot be built with cython 3.0.5, please change the build dependency from cython3 to cython3-legacy (available now in unstable). There is no replacement for cython3-dbg. The attached patch