On 6/12/24 13:33, Jakub Ružička wrote:
I did what I could with the upstream packaging, so now it's your turn with
debian/experimental, Daniel, if you have the time :)
thanks for all the work - I will have a time for everything this Friday
afternoon/evening and will report back.
Regards,
Hey Daniel,
I did a spring cleaning in upstream debian packaging (distro/pkg/deb),
merging -core and -manager into knot-resolver6, porting most of your
debian/experimental patches, and removing many lintian warnings.
This was done in upstream MRs now merged into `master` branch (which is now
v6,
Yo Santiago (CC'd), could you please drop your opinion on this for extra
reference?
On 4/30/24 18:34, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Hi,
On 4/30/24 18:12, Jakub Ružička wrote:
Secondary reason for that was that there is no upgrade path from 5.x
to 6.x so it's unwanted for knot-resolver 5 packages to
Hi,
On 4/30/24 18:12, Jakub Ružička wrote:
Secondary reason for that was that there is no upgrade path from 5.x to
6.x so it's unwanted for knot-resolver 5 packages to auto-update to 6.
For that, the package probably needs a different name (like
knot-resolver6)
imho this should be handled
On 4/29/24 21:13, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 4/29/24 19:50, Daniel Baumann wrote:
pushing to the repo requires me to be added to the salsa project..
would you mind adding me?
in the meantime, I've pushed to here:
https://git.progress-linux.org/users/daniel.baumann/debian/todo/knot-resolver/log/
On 4/29/24 19:50, Daniel Baumann wrote:
pushing to the repo requires me to be added to the salsa project.. would
you mind adding me?
in the meantime, I've pushed to here:
https://git.progress-linux.org/users/daniel.baumann/debian/todo/knot-resolver/log/
before I'll continue: what's the idea
On 4/23/24 14:45, Jakub Ružička wrote:
Awesome, I've forwarded your words of praise to the hard-working Knot
Resolver team :)
(jftr: we switched in 2015 from cisco ncr to unbound, and in 2016 from
unbound to knot-resolver.. and are super happy ever since)
I'm actually quite interested in
On 4/23/24 14:05, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Hi,
On 4/23/24 13:58, Jakub Ružička wrote:
but we've agreed the time has come to get extra testing & feedback
through Debian experimental.
yay, thanks!
[ we use knot-resolver at work for the central resolvers for the
university, and we love it. kresd
Hi,
On 4/23/24 13:58, Jakub Ružička wrote:
but we've agreed the time has come to get extra testing & feedback
through Debian experimental.
yay, thanks!
[ we use knot-resolver at work for the central resolvers for the
university, and we love it. kresd 6 offers some nice improvements for
us,
Hello,
we have a working upstream packages for knot-resolver 6.x alpha at
https://pkg.labs.nic.cz/doc/?project=knot-resolver
but we've agreed the time has come to get extra testing & feedback
through Debian experimental.
The only blocker for that is missing python3-json-schema-for-humans
Package: knot-resolver
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
it would be nice if you could upload knot-resolver 6.x to experimental.
Regards,
Daniel
11 matches
Mail list logo
