Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
Hm. All the words that I had intended to be there are there. I clearly
need to rephrase it somehow, though, if it's not clear. How about:
When two packages both declare the same
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
Hm. All the words that I had intended to be there are there. I clearly
need to rephrase it somehow, though, if it's not clear. How about:
When two packages both declare the same ttconffile/tt, they may
see left-over
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org (20/08/2010):
Objections or seconds?
Seconded. Both this version and the other, reworded version.
Mraw,
KiBi.
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 9037de8..5fdf775 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -7950,22 +7950,6 @@ ln -fs
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
Objections or seconds?
Looks mostly good except:
@@ -8014,6 +7998,34 @@ ln -fs ../sbin/sendmail debian/tmp/usr/bin/runq
and which manages the shared configuration files. (The
ttsgml-base/tt package is a good example.)
/p
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
+ p
+A package that declares the same ttconffile/tt as another,
+conflicting package may see left-over configuration files from
+that other package.
EPARSE on this sentence, it
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
+p
+ A package that declares the same ttconffile/tt as another,
+ conflicting package may see left-over configuration files from
+ that other
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
What happens if you have a package on the system that's removed but not
purged and you install another package (conflicting with the first)
that contains the same conffile? I suspect the conffile will be
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
Yann Dirson ydir...@mygale.org writes:
Richard Braakman writes:
Yesterday I noticed that Debian policy is incorrect on this:
Only packages that are tagged *conflicting* with each other may
specify the same file as `conffile'. A
Yann Dirson ydir...@mygale.org writes:
Richard Braakman writes:
Yesterday I noticed that Debian policy is incorrect on this:
Only packages that are tagged *conflicting* with each other may
specify the same file as `conffile'. A package may not modify a
configuration file of
9 matches
Mail list logo
