Hi,
I just subscribed to this list, read the archives from last summer, esp.
http://albatross.madduck.net/pipermail/gammu-legal/2004-October/000112.html
and would like to hear your comments regarding the solution of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266566.
If I understood the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-02-2005 13:57, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
I just subscribed to this list, read the archives from last summer, esp.
http://albatross.madduck.net/pipermail/gammu-legal/2004-October/000112.html
and would like to hear your comments regarding
Hi
On Thu 3. 2. 2005 13:57, Holger Levsen wrote:
I just subscribed to this list, read the archives from last summer, esp.
http://albatross.madduck.net/pipermail/gammu-legal/2004-October/000112.html
This is patch for gammu and it is already applied in gammu.
and would like to hear your
Hi
On Thu 3. 2. 2005 13:57, Holger Levsen wrote:
I just subscribed to this list, read the archives from last summer, esp.
http://albatross.madduck.net/pipermail/gammu-legal/2004-October/000112.html
This is patch for gammu and it is already applied in gammu.
and would like to hear your
Hi Jonas,
On Thursday 03 February 2005 17:56, you wrote:
Holger: This ends on gammu-legal only, not the bugreport. Deliberate?
aehmmm, yes - on purpose - but on a wrong mission after reading two answers
pointing me wrong on topic gnokii ;-)
Re-including the bugreport now, as it turned out to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-02-2005 19:27, Holger Levsen wrote:
/me has just talked with the author on #gnokii - he said he'll fix the issue
in the next release of gnokii.
Great!
- Jonas
Curious about the outcome of their investigations...
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:41:03PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 03-02-2005 19:27, Holger Levsen wrote:
/me has just talked with the author on #gnokii - he said he'll fix the
issue in the next release of gnokii.
Great!
As per my previous posts to the bug report, I've already
contacted
7 matches
Mail list logo
