Bug#283231: why bother with sudo-ldap package

2005-12-01 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 11:23 +1100, Geoff Crompton wrote: Why not just turn on ldap support in the plain sudo package? Hrm. Well, right now sudo only depends on libc6 and the PAM libraries, so it would add another library dependency. It's probably not a big deal, but folks who aren't using ldap

Bug#283231: why bother with sudo-ldap package

2005-12-01 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
Quoting Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'll turn it on for the next upload and we'll see if anyone screams. Please don't! Try my patch instead (it's in the bug archive). It creates a sudo-ldap package in addition to the original sudo package... -- Soviet explosion assassination domestic

Bug#283231: why bother with sudo-ldap package

2005-11-30 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
Quoting Geoff Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Why not just turn on ldap support in the plain sudo package? I think that will install the openldap libraries. Not everyone might want/need that.. But I modified the patch provided by Paul Evans to create the sudo-ldap package AS WELL as the standard

Bug#283231: why bother with sudo-ldap package

2005-11-29 Thread Geoff Crompton
Why not just turn on ldap support in the plain sudo package? Reading http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/readme_ldap.html, it suggests that if you don't have the line sudoers_base ou=SUDOers,dc=example,dc=com in your /etc/ldap.conf file, then sudo will ignore ldap. If it ignores ldap, it uses the