On Saturday 22 January 2005 16:34, Siggi Langauf wrote:
> > It seems to me that the 1.0 version of xine uses significantly more cpu
> > than any of the release candidates. Something like 10-30% more. I used
> Sorry, I'm unable to reproduce this. 1.0-1 performs exactly as well as the
> RC series her
tags 291673 unreproducible
thanks.
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> It seems to me that the 1.0 version of xine uses significantly more cpu
> than any of the release candidates. Something like 10-30% more. I used
> to be able to run xine over ssh on my server and watch the
Package: libxine1
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: minor
It seems to me that the 1.0 version of xine uses significantly more cpu
than any of the release candidates. Something like 10-30% more. I used
to be able to run xine over ssh on my server and watch the goom output
locally, but I can't with versi
3 matches
Mail list logo
