On Tue 22 Mar 2005 14:58:56 -0800,
Andrew Pimlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:07:00PM -0500, Rik Faith wrote:
I've added an english and a trans virtual dictionary to the dict.org
and test.dict.org servers. The default is still to show everything --
it
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:07:00PM -0500, Rik Faith wrote:
I've added an english and a trans virtual dictionary to the dict.org
and test.dict.org servers. The default is still to show everything --
it demonstrates the fine freedict.org work that I've been remiss in not
showing off sooner.
It
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:10:23AM -0500, Rik Faith wrote:
I could add a virtual dictionary of non-translating dictionaries that is
not normally searched. Then you could search in, e.g., the
non-translating database -- then you could depend on me to keep it up
to date when I change the
On Mon 21 Mar 2005 09:33:55 -0800,
Andrew Pimlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:10:23AM -0500, Rik Faith wrote:
I could add a virtual dictionary of non-translating dictionaries that is
not normally searched. Then you could search in, e.g., the
non-translating
Hi. I use the dict client all the time, and noticed that dict.org
recently added translation dictionaries to the default list. This is a
cool idea, but it's kind of annoying to run dict looking for a
definition and get a long list of translations at the end. There
doesn't seem to be any easy
5 matches
Mail list logo
