On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:10:14PM -0500, "Lord of, St. Luke Valor" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> Is it possible to respond with a more specific description of the jfs2/apt
> conflict? Any response is beneficial.
The conflict is described in the bug log, along with some commentary
on
Dear M Sladen:
Is it possible to respond with a more specific description of the jfs2/apt
conflict? Any response is beneficial.
Due to the distributed nature of Bug Responses, someone may already be
developing a patch. Thank you for your contribution.
Luke
On 11/28/07, Paul Sladen <[EMAIL PROTE
Hit this "apt relying on shared writeable" issue today with a jffs2 issue.
N800/Maemo seem to have got around this by (I think using an older version
of apt?); it's all a bit messy and could really do with handling
transparently within apt.
First messages I found on this were from 2001, over at h
3 matches
Mail list logo
