also sprach Alexander Gattin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.06.18.0037 +0200]:
Why so? I see different behaviour (/dev/pts/3).
Maybe you mean the difference between login and su?
[ssh into the box; login shell /bin/bash]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ egrep -i '00(07|22)' /etc/profile ~/.bash_profile
Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: login
Version: 1:4.0.3-31sarge5
Severity: wishlist
Since any login session these days will invoke a shell, there is no
point in having login.defs set the umask -- the shell will override
it anyway. Thus, so that people do not have to
also sprach Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.06.17.0751 +0200]:
This comes from a discussion in debian-devel. In that discussion, the
existence of the pam_umask module was also mentioned.
Hence, I suggest that, when commenting the UMASK setting in the default
login.defs file, we add
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:18:13AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Since any login session these days will invoke a shell,
Not true.
there is no point in having login.defs set the umask
-- the shell will override it anyway.
Not true again: tcsh, zsh
Thus, so that people do not have to
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:09:07AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.06.17.0751 +0200]:
This comes from a discussion in debian-devel. In that discussion, the
existence of the pam_umask module was also mentioned.
Even without pam_umask,
5 matches
Mail list logo
