On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:10:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:51:06AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:30:57PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
[Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Domenico Andreoli wrote:
BTW, i don't think it is a good idea to
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:30:57PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
[Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Domenico Andreoli wrote:
BTW, i don't think it is a good idea to distribute boost binaries built
with a compiler that has never seen the boost regression test suite.
I got uneasy as well but ooking on the
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:51:06AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:30:57PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
[Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Domenico Andreoli wrote:
BTW, i don't think it is a good idea to distribute boost binaries built
with a compiler that has never seen the
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 08:13:55PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
I plan on NMUing boost for the CXX transition today. See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html
The idea is from here:
https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10768
I will
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:50:22AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 08:13:55PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
I plan on NMUing boost for the CXX transition today. See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html
The idea is from
Hello!
[Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Domenico Andreoli wrote:
please stop. i'm working to the upcoming 1.33.0 release. this will
handle the transition to gcc 4.0 in the simplest, safest and cleanest way.
i'm already testing it with gcc 4.0. i'm planning a release in few days.
Ok. Thanks.
BTW, i don't
Package: boost
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
I plan on NMUing boost for the CXX transition today. See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html
The idea is from here:
https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10768
I will attach a patch as soon as I have
7 matches
Mail list logo
