Bug#324741: dpkg-gencontrol - loosed support for arch depend Depends line somewhere ago

2005-08-24 Thread Scott James Remnant
reopen 170575 merge 170575 324741 thanks On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 20:21 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: #170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not accept such dependency lines. dpkg has _never_ had support for arch-specific Depend lines, just Build-Depend. That bug

Bug#324741: dpkg-gencontrol - loosed support for arch depend Depends line somewhere ago

2005-08-24 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:30:32PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 20:21 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: #170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not accept such dependency lines. dpkg has _never_ had support for arch-specific Depend lines, just

Bug#324741: dpkg-gencontrol - loosed support for arch depend Depends line somewhere ago

2005-08-24 Thread Adam Heath
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Scott James Remnant wrote: reopen 170575 merge 170575 324741 thanks On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 20:21 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: #170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not accept such dependency lines. dpkg has _never_ had support for

Bug#324741: dpkg-gencontrol - loosed support for arch depend Depends line somewhere ago

2005-08-24 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 15:25 -0500, Adam Heath wrote: On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Scott James Remnant wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 20:21 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: #170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not accept such dependency lines. dpkg has _never_ had

Bug#324741: dpkg-gencontrol - loosed support for arch depend Depends line somewhere ago

2005-08-23 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: dpkg Version: 1.13.11 Severity: normal #170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not accept such dependency lines. Bastian -- She won' go Warp 7, Cap'n! The batteries are dead! signature.asc Description: Digital signature