Bug#328481: libgphoto2 should use the plugdev group, rather than camera

2005-12-09 Thread Christopher Martin
Christopher Martin wrote: But I don't see any real reason to separate plugdev and camera. If the plugdev group were such a massive potential security problem to the point where someone might want to grant camera access but not plugdev access (I just can't envision such a scenario), then

Bug#328481: libgphoto2 should use the plugdev group, rather than camera

2005-09-15 Thread Christopher Martin
Package: libgphoto2 Version: 2.1.6-3 Severity: wishlist Hello, The coming deprecation of /etc/hotplug/usb presents an opportunity to change the group that libgphoto2 uses to regulate access, camera, to the more general plugdev group, already used by USB sticks and sundry other USB pluggable

Bug#328481: libgphoto2 should use the plugdev group, rather than camera

2005-09-15 Thread Frederic Peters
Christopher Martin wrote: Package: libgphoto2 Version: 2.1.6-3 Severity: wishlist Hello, The coming deprecation of /etc/hotplug/usb presents an opportunity to change the group that libgphoto2 uses to regulate access, camera, to the more general plugdev group, already used by USB

Bug#328481: libgphoto2 should use the plugdev group, rather than camera

2005-09-15 Thread Christopher Martin
On September 15, 2005 12:10, you wrote: Christopher Martin wrote: Package: libgphoto2 Version: 2.1.6-3 Severity: wishlist Hello, The coming deprecation of /etc/hotplug/usb presents an opportunity to change the group that libgphoto2 uses to regulate access, camera, to the more