Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:50:44 -0700:
Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: gdk-imlib1
Version: 1.9.14-22
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Unless there is something big I am missing, gdk-imlib should
certainly not take
Package: gdk-imlib1
Version: 1.9.14-22
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi,
Unless there is something big I am missing, gdk-imlib should
certainly not take it upon itself to force the removal of
libpng2 and all its dependencies...
Josselin: I see from #323354 that you
Le mercredi 12 octobre 2005 à 15:53 +0930, Ron a écrit :
Package: gdk-imlib1
Version: 1.9.14-22
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Software depending on a library is not unrelated software.
Unless there is something big I am missing, gdk-imlib should
certainly not
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:30:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 03:53:18PM +0930, Ron wrote:
Package: gdk-imlib1
Version: 1.9.14-22
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Unless there is something big I am missing,
Yes, there is. The
Le mercredi 12 octobre 2005 à 18:37 +0930, Ron a écrit :
You should just rebuild the package against gdk-imlib11, that's all.
That package is linked against libpng12, as libpng2/libpng10 has been
removed as well.
In this case I just need to fix the build-dep from png10 - png12,
(for the
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 12 octobre 2005 à 18:37 +0930, Ron a écrit :
You should just rebuild the package against gdk-imlib11, that's all.
That package is linked against libpng12, as libpng2/libpng10 has been
removed as well.
In
Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In this case I just need to fix the build-dep from png10 - png12,
(for the bits I'm responsible for) but I guess I missed the memo
that we were rolling on that this week. I'm not unhappy that it's
happening, just surprised at how...
We actually rolled on that a
7 matches
Mail list logo
