Bug#333531: Bayesian classification much less efficient that with 3.0.2

2005-11-17 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: spamassassin Version: 3.1.0a-2 Hello Duncan, I retried with 3.1.0a-2, and this time I deleted the bayesian database and rebuilt it from my spam/ham maiboxes. The results are better but there still the problem of sa-learn --spam having no effect on the rating of some spam, whereas the

Bug#333531: Bayesian classification much less efficient that with 3.0.2

2005-10-12 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: spamassassin Version: 3.1.0a-1 Severity: normal Hello Duncan, Since I have upgraded to 3.1.0a-1, bayesian filtering is far less efficient than with the sarge version or 3.0.4. Symptoms are a ton of spam with BAYES_50, sa-learn not increasing the bayesian probability most of the time

Bug#333531: Bayesian classification much less efficient that with 3.0.2

2005-10-12 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:42:03PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: Hello Duncan, Since I have upgraded to 3.1.0a-1, bayesian filtering is far less efficient than with the sarge version or 3.0.4. Symptoms are a ton of spam with BAYES_50, sa-learn not increasing the bayesian probability most of

Bug#333531: Bayesian classification much less efficient that with 3.0.2

2005-10-12 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:01:35AM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:42:03PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: Hello Duncan, Since I have upgraded to 3.1.0a-1, bayesian filtering is far less efficient than with the sarge version or 3.0.4. Symptoms are a ton of spam