Op zondag 09-12-2007 om 14:27 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Arjan van
Schijndel:
> Dear Joop,
>
> Closing he bugs is no problem, I agree with you on this account.
>
> Probably it is not a necessity, but mentioning that the libax25 and it
> is functions depend on certain kernel versions is mandat
Dear Joop,
Closing he bugs is no problem, I agree with you on this account.
Probably it is not a necessity, but mentioning that the libax25 and it
is functions depend on certain kernel versions is mandatory.
Don't make it a depend on kernel x.x, but a suggestion to use this
kernel. But definitel
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Joop,
Thank you for mentioning that my current etch system is running well
with a 2.4 kernel.
I think you are correct about putting a banner in the packages, that
they are depend on 2.6 or other kernel series or al least kernel x and
up.
I am not sure if you can dete
>
> Technically you are right, there is no bug in libax25 or FBB. But the
> problem was that both the libax25 and FBB were compiled with wrong
> options. Hence my remark that you let libax25 depend on the right
> kernel. So a dependency and not a suggestion.
>
Hello Arjan,
Letting the packages de
Dear readers,
For the bug and solution I refer to my email of 15 November 2005.
I read the comment of Hamid, sorry to say, you are wrong.
I am not sure about version number of libax25, but they depend
directly on kernel functions.
If I am correct there are 2 major changes one in from 2.0 kernel
5 matches
Mail list logo
