On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:35:20PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As of a couple of days ago, the BTS now supports fixed and notfixed
commands. These add a version to, and remove a version from, the list of
versions in which the bug is recorded as being fixed, without affecting
the bug's open
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 10:58 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.9.8
Severity: wishlist
[...]
'bts' has support for 'found' and 'notfound'
to change the 'found' part in a bug
it would be nice if 'bts' had a support for
'fixed' and 'notfixed',
(maybe using the
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 05:25:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
A Mennucc wrote:
Suppose moreover that somebody sends a
$ bts close #wrongbugnumber #version
where #wrongbugnumber is a mistyping: then it
would be useful to have a command
$ bts unfixed #wrongbugnumber #version
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:25:23PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[A Mennucc]
$ bts fixed #bugnumber #version [why]
that sends an email to -done with a Version: pseudo-header ;
I don't like the idea of encouraging people to fit the reason for
closing a bug onto a single line.
I
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:02:51PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:25:23PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[A Mennucc]
I don't like the idea of encouraging people to fit the reason for
closing a bug onto a single line.
I was thinking of something like:
bts done
btw, I have a question that I could not find in
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00010.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg6.html
[3] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer
When does BTS decide that a bug is closed, (and starts the 30
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:19:26PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
btw, I have a question that I could not find in
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00010.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg6.html
[3] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 07:09:06PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:58:01AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
What exactly would this mean?
add
$ bts fixed #bugnumber #version
as an alias to
$ bts close #bugnumber #version
indeed the purpose of that command is to set the
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:10:48PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 07:09:06PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:58:01AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
What exactly would this mean?
add
$ bts fixed #bugnumber #version
as an alias to
$ bts close
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 07:32:35PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:10:48PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 07:09:06PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:58:01AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
add
$ bts fixed #bugnumber #version
A Mennucc wrote:
add
$ bts fixed #bugnumber #version
as an alias to
$ bts close #bugnumber #version
indeed the purpose of that command is to set the fixed field in the
bug report.
No, the purpose is to mark the bug as closed in that particular version.
Suppose moreover that
[A Mennucc]
$ bts fixed #bugnumber #version [why]
that sends an email to -done with a Version: pseudo-header ;
I don't like the idea of encouraging people to fit the reason for
closing a bug onto a single line.
(I'm also the guy who very rarely uses svn commit -m message, for the
same
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.9.8
Severity: wishlist
hi
currently the BTS has versions, and it shows
in which version(s) a bug was found and
was fixed
'bts' has support for 'found' and 'notfound'
to change the 'found' part in a bug
it would be nice if 'bts' had a support for
'fixed' and
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:58:01AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.9.8
Severity: wishlist
hi
currently the BTS has versions, and it shows
in which version(s) a bug was found and
was fixed
'bts' has support for 'found' and 'notfound'
to change the 'found' part
14 matches
Mail list logo
