Bug#341140: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Luk Claes
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:28:46PM +1100, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote: On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: block 341140 by 400952 thankyou Hi Anibal and Javier, I (as the new maintainer of autofs) would like to have the issue settled before Etch is

Bug#341140: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:28:01PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: What's wrong with Steinar's suggestion to change the name of the autofs script to be something between 19nis and 20apache? It's gross but it should work. At this late stage in the release cycle it looks like the best option. -- You

Bug#341140: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:17:18AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: But IMO this solution is an ugly hack and highly counterintuitive - init scripts are config files after all, and if I wanted to adapt a package's initscript to my needs, I'd expect to find it at /etc/init.d/${package}, not

Bug#341140: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, AnĂ­bal Monsalve Salazar said: On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: The present situation forces all users of nisautofs to manually shuffle their init scripts around, and this is a very common setup... Moving autofs to start