sean finney wrote:
> i've created an etch pbuilder chroot and produced some debs:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~seanius/mysql/etch/
>
> i haven't verified anything about these other than the fact that they
> built sucessfully, so a once-over would be appreciated. after i've
> heard back from the
hi christian,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 11:36:47AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Feel free to upload this to t-p-u.
> I created an etch-5.0 branch for this based on the current 5.0 branch:
> svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/mysql-dfsg-41/branches/etch-5.0
ok, i've merged the changes (just lines in
Hello Sean
On 2005-12-06 sean finney wrote:
> as steve suggested, i've given them a 5.0.16-0+etch1 version so they
> will immediately upgrade to the versions currently in sid. they
> are based off of what's in svn as 5.0.16-2 but not yet released (which
> is just the initial upstream release + a
hi steve, olaf,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:30:23AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yeah, it simply won't work. You'd need to give this build a distinguishing
> version number that's < the version in unstable; perhaps 5.0.16-0+etch1.
>
> I'd advise against giving it a different upstream version nu
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 04:21:48AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> while in a lecture this morning i found my thoughts travelling back to
> this bug report for some reason and...
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:58:47PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > New upstream versions for RC bugfixes are allowed vi
hi,
while in a lecture this morning i found my thoughts travelling back to
this bug report for some reason and...
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:58:47PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> New upstream versions for RC bugfixes are allowed via t-p-u, yes.
this may stem from my unfamiliarity with tpu: how
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:58:47PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > that said, if you can get someone from the release team to sign
> > off on such an upload, i'll happily do it when i have a chance.
>
> New upstream versions for RC bugfixes are allowed via t-p-u, yes.
okay, cool--thanks. i'll s
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:21:52PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:04:41PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > Isn't it possible (and much easier) to compile 5.0.16 completely in a
> > testing dev environment and upload that?
> hrm, i didn't think that you could do that wit
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 12:29:56PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:52:22PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > >well, if you're not able/willing to try the version in unstable, then
> > >i suggest that we do the following:
> > I can confirm that the linked reduced test case
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:04:41PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Isn't it possible (and much easier) to compile 5.0.16 completely in a
> testing dev environment and upload that?
hrm, i didn't think that you could do that with tpu (uploading
a new upstream version). my impression, and the dev
sean finney wrote:
notfound 341705 5.0.16-1
thanks
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:32:58PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
If/when binutils gets fixed it's at least another 10 days.
What about testing-proposed-updates?
honestly, it's more work/time than i'm willing to give, and i'm reluctant
to
notfound 341705 5.0.16-1
thanks
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:32:58PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> If/when binutils gets fixed it's at least another 10 days.
> What about testing-proposed-updates?
honestly, it's more work/time than i'm willing to give, and i'm reluctant
to put work into a probl
sean finney wrote:
hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:52:22PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
well, if you're not able/willing to try the version in unstable, then
i suggest that we do the following:
I can confirm that the linked reduced test case does not crash in
5.0.16-Debian_1.
okay, i w
hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:52:22PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> >well, if you're not able/willing to try the version in unstable, then
> >i suggest that we do the following:
>
> I can confirm that the linked reduced test case does not crash in
> 5.0.16-Debian_1.
okay, i wasn't sure if
sean finney wrote:
hi olaf,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
See for example http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=13545
The server is running custom game lobby servers (http://xwis.net/),
scripts and dynamic web pages and it kept restarting within a minute.
I can
hi olaf,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> See for example http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=13545
> The server is running custom game lobby servers (http://xwis.net/),
> scripts and dynamic web pages and it kept restarting within a minute.
> I can't tell for sur
sean finney wrote:
hi olaf,
sorry there hasn't been a response sooner, christian's on
vacation and i just realized that i wasn't subscribed to the bug
feed for mysql-dfsg-5.0.
anyway, i'll need some more information before we can do anything:
- does it crash on certain queries, or other condit
tags 341705 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
hi olaf,
sorry there hasn't been a response sooner, christian's on
vacation and i just realized that i wasn't subscribed to the bug
feed for mysql-dfsg-5.0.
anyway, i'll need some more information before we can do anything:
- does it crash on certain q
18 matches
Mail list logo
