Bug#342247: [SPAM?]: Bug#342247: marked as done (updating tetex-extra fails)

2005-12-11 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had two points of failure: 1. I refused to replace the changed language.dat by that one from the maintainers. The old one referenced the hyph. patterns czhyph2e.tex, which does not exist any more in teTeX 2.0. Hence the build of all formats having

Bug#342247: marked as done (updating tetex-extra fails)

2005-12-10 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 08.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 07.12.05 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, According to our analysis, the bug occurred because you kept woody's configuration files and refused the update to the sarge

Bug#342247: marked as done (updating tetex-extra fails)

2005-12-09 Thread Robert Sander
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:15:21PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote: Robert, can you send us your /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf and /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf, ideally the versions before you fixed it? Hi! No, I am sorry, I already purged the tetex packages and reinstalled. It's now working for me.

Bug#342247: marked as done (updating tetex-extra fails)

2005-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 07.12.05 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: According to our analysis, the bug occurred because you kept woody's configuration files and refused the update to the sarge versions - in other words it is not a bug, and I'm closing it.