Bug#344995: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#344995: Solution

2005-12-30 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* folajimi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-29 14:20]: > Did you ever hear back from the upstream developers regarding our build > issues? Paul Kienzle and David Bateman, both upstream developers of octave-forge, participated to the current thread, but they do not really address the specific problems

Bug#344995: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#344995: Solution

2005-12-29 Thread folajimi
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * folajimi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-29 11:55]: > > > Is there anything that Colin and I can do yet? Colin is out of town, > > but I was just wondering if we will be able to resume work on the task > > assigned to us. > > IIRC, the task assigned

Bug#344995: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#344995: Solution

2005-12-29 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* folajimi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-29 11:55]: > Is there anything that Colin and I can do yet? Colin is out of town, > but I was just wondering if we will be able to resume work on the task > assigned to us. IIRC, the task assigned to Colin and you was to split the octave-forge binary packag

Bug#344995: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#344995: Solution

2005-12-29 Thread folajimi
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Joaquim Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-29 10:02]: > > > I believe that I have identified the bug. [...] With this three-line > > fix the package built fine. > > Thanks *_a lot_* for that! The package indeed builds fine in sid with > your sug

Bug#344995: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#344995: Solution

2005-12-29 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Joaquim Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-29 10:02]: > I believe that I have identified the bug. [...] With this three-line > fix the package built fine. Thanks *_a lot_* for that! The package indeed builds fine in sid with your suggested changes. I prepared a new version of octave-forge wh