On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 02:47:20AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Hrmz, is there any good reason to really have this many (4 until I just
removed gmime0) versions of the same library in Debian? Only if it's very
difficult to migrate to a next version, and there are a lot of reverse
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 12:13:38PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
We already discussed that (see the bug complete bugreport). Ove is still
the maintainer of gmime1, so I defer the decission to remove it to him,
but otherwise I'd ask for its removal as well. I guess I could remove
gmime2 in favour
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 12:30:03PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
I don't like to rename the source package to 'gmime', I've seen to many
cases of a new major version of a library coming out that wasn't
backwards compatible at all (not even at compile time) with previous
versions, so
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 03:59:09PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 06:40:32PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
søn, 30.05.2004 kl. 13.37 skrev Guus Sliepen:
I am planning to upload libgmime2 with just the Maintainer: field
changed, and a new libgmime2.1 package. However,
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 06:40:32PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
søn, 30.05.2004 kl. 13.37 skrev Guus Sliepen:
I am planning to upload libgmime2 with just the Maintainer: field
changed, and a new libgmime2.1 package. However, there are also packages
in
5 matches
Mail list logo
