Eddy Petrişor" wrote:
> I managed to test it on MAC OS X with fink and found an interesting
> thing: not all regex implmentation work well enough to write something
> like: 'sed -e s/[, ]\+/ /g' so I changed this into "sed -e s/[, ]/ /g
> | tr -s ' '"
correct. "+" is an extended regex, and sed sho
On 2/28/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you should introduce the test only if fetch script
> > should wait. And in this case we have already a numeric argument.
> >
>
> Done, but i am not sure if the generated code is the correct one. (I
> just made the modifications and I
On 2/27/06, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was refering to this:
> >
> >> give in my debian machine:
> >> do_wget()
> >> { wget -t3 -nv -O $2 $1
> >> [ ! -z sleep is /bin/sleep ] && sleep ""
> >> return $?
> >
> > the 'sleep ""' should be "sleep SOMETHING-NUMERIC"
> >
> > o
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 2/27/06, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Would you like to make the changes for the sleep period to be always
defined? I will have access to the code only this evening, so the
patch would be available only tomorrow.
What do you mean?
On 2/27/06, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > Would you like to make the changes for the sleep period to be always
> > defined? I will have access to the code only this evening, so the
> > patch would be available only tomorrow.
>
> What do you mean? On norm
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Would you like to make the changes for the sleep period to be always
defined? I will have access to the code only this evening, so the
patch would be available only tomorrow.
What do you mean? On normal usage, the fetch script should not
sleep. And the other issues are only
On 2/27/06, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Note: I din't understood what has changed, but the test for the
> > existance of sleep should not miss as it would break the whole
> > download script instead of gracefully failing ;-)
>
> I don't understand.
> It would write an error
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 2/27/06, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor" wrote:
an other maybe better version
at the beginning (only on home computer)
if [ "${SLEEPTIME}" ] ; then
SLEEPCMD="sleep ${SLEEPTIME} || true"
I don't understand the reason behind the part wi
On 2/27/06, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eddy Petrişor" wrote:
> >>an other maybe better version
> >>
> >>at the beginning (only on home computer)
> >>if [ "${SLEEPTIME}" ] ; then
> >>SLEEPCMD="sleep ${SLEEPTIME} || true"
> >
> >
> > I don't understand the reason behind the
Eddy Petrişor" wrote:
>>an other maybe better version
>>
>>at the beginning (only on home computer)
>>if [ "${SLEEPTIME}" ] ; then
>>SLEEPCMD="sleep ${SLEEPTIME} || true"
>
>
> I don't understand the reason behind the part with "|| true"
>
> This should do:
> SLEEPCMD="type sleep && sleep ${SLE
> an other maybe better version
>
> at the beginning (only on home computer)
> if [ "${SLEEPTIME}" ] ; then
> SLEEPCMD="sleep ${SLEEPTIME} || true"
I don't understand the reason behind the part with "|| true"
This should do:
SLEEPCMD="type sleep && sleep ${SLEEPTIME}"
> else
> SLEEPCMD="
Package: apt-zip
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello Giacomo,
I have worked a little on the apt-zip package trying to close a few
bugs ad making improvemnts.
I have attached a current (my version) modified version of apt-zip
(full source) and a patch that should provide the same thing starting
12 matches
Mail list logo
