Turbo Fredriksson skrev:
>>Wouldn't it simpler to just remove the "#!NO_MODULE" then? What was the
>>reason for putting in those lines in the upstream source?
>
> No, because there are checks in place for this string. Can't remember exactly
> where I found it (I found it when packaging Roxen3 year
Quoting Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Turbo Fredriksson skrev:
>> Quoting Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>>The extra lines containing just a "#" before the "#!NO_MODULE" lines in
>>>modules/throttling/throttlelib.pike and
>>>modules/icecast/pl_common.pike, which are introduce
Turbo Fredriksson skrev:
> Quoting Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>The extra lines containing just a "#" before the "#!NO_MODULE" lines in
>>modules/throttling/throttlelib.pike and
>>modules/icecast/pl_common.pike, which are introduced by
>>patches/001_pike_path, cause compilation erro
Quoting Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: roxen4
> Version: 4.0.325-6
> Severity: normal
>
> The extra lines containing just a "#" before the "#!NO_MODULE" lines in
> modules/throttling/throttlelib.pike and
> modules/icecast/pl_common.pike, which are introduced by
> patches/001_pi
Package: roxen4
Version: 4.0.325-6
Severity: normal
The extra lines containing just a "#" before the "#!NO_MODULE" lines in
modules/throttling/throttlelib.pike and
modules/icecast/pl_common.pike, which are introduced by patches/001_pike_path,
cause compilation errors. Is there
any reason for t
5 matches
Mail list logo
