Hello,
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
+# ... We should not override ac_cv_exeext if it was
+# cached, so that the user can short-circuit this test for compilers
+# unknown to Autoconf.
... but it would be better if this override were done by assigning
Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* doc/autoconf.texi (System Services): Do not document
overriding EXEEXT via ac_cv_exeext=ext.
Thanks, I installed that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
patch forgotten, sorry. Attached to this mail.
Stepan
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:06:53PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
+# ... We should not override ac_cv_exeext if it was
+# cached, so that the user can
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sure. The first patch is the exeext-reversal.diff here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2006-05/msg00090.html
and the second patch is the exeext-postreversal2.diff here:
Hi Eric, Paul,
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:49:17PM CEST:
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 5/25/2006 4:49 AM:
+# in a Makefile. Because we should not override ac_cv_exeext if it was
+# cached, so that the user can short-circuit this test for compilers
+# unknown to
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:05:53AM CEST:
* lib/autoconf/lang.m4 (_AC_COMPILER_EXEEXT_DEFAULT): Drop the
initialization of `ac_cv_exeext', do not override it if it was
already set. Add comment about this potential backward
incompatibility. Do not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ralf,
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 5/25/2006 4:49 AM:
2006-05-25 Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* lib/autoconf/lang.m4 (_AC_COMPILER_EXEEXT_DEFAULT): Drop the
initialization of
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK to commit first the reversal patch posted in an earlier
message, then this one?
Sorry, I've lost context. Can you please give us a single message
that contains both patches, or a URL to both patches? Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi Paul,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, May 26, 2006 at 12:04:40AM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK to commit first the reversal patch posted in an earlier
message, then this one?
Sorry, I've lost context. Can you please give us a single message
that contains both
* lib/autoconf/lang.m4 (_AC_COMPILER_EXEEXT_DEFAULT): Drop the
initialization of `ac_cv_exeext', do not override it if it was
already set. Add comment about this potential backward
incompatibility. Do not export `ac_cv_exeext', Libtool hasn't
needed this for
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:08:38PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still wondering whether we should just simply revert both patches,
I have talked with Ralf by phone, and I agree with him that backing
out my cleanup (plus later fixes to it) and
Hello,
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still wondering whether we should just simply revert both patches,
I have talked with Ralf by phone, and I agree with him that backing
out my cleanup (plus later fixes to it) and replacing it by a couple
of straightforward fixes for the
Package: autoconf
Version: 2.59.cvs.2006.05.13-1
Severity: important
If crosscompiling an autotools based package with mingw for Windows using this
autoconf version, the resulting executable misses the .exe extension.
Going back to autoconf-2.59a-9 solves the problem.
Steps to reproduce:
-
Tim Kosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
./configure --host=i586-mingw32msvc --target=i496-mingw32msvc
Does it have the same behavior without the typo (496 - 486)?
--
Ben Pfaff
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://benpfaff.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Pfaff wrote:
Tim Kosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
./configure --host=i586-mingw32msvc --target=i496-mingw32msvc
Does it have the same behavior without the typo (496 - 486)?
Sorry for the typo, the line should have been ./configure
-
Tim Kosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben Pfaff wrote:
Tim Kosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
./configure --host=i586-mingw32msvc --target=i496-mingw32msvc
Does it have the same behavior without the typo (496 - 486)?
Sorry for the typo, the line should have been ./configure
[ Cc:ing bug-autoconf as this is a genuine bug IMHO. ]
Hi Tim,
Thanks for reporting this!
* Tim Kosse wrote on Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:56:01AM CEST:
Package: autoconf
Version: 2.59.cvs.2006.05.13-1
Severity: important
If crosscompiling an autotools based package with mingw for Windows
Re http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368012,
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2006-04/msg00027.html
... broke this.
I'm still wondering whether we should just simply revert both patches,
... and leave a cleanup of
18 matches
Mail list logo
