Hi Günter,
I think this is at least worth a wishlist
bug against jackd, because jackd should tell us that it can't do
the samplerate we asked for.
I agree, at the moment it's confusing for people who have this type of
sound chipset, and it seems these are very common now. Jack already
prints
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Daniel James wrote:
> So this behaviour is not a bug in Debian, it is a limitation of certain
> sound hardware that can only do 48kHz sampling. There may be a
> work-around using ALSA's plug layer for software resampling, but this is
> unlikely to give good JACK performance.
I reported this to the ALSA team - Takashi Iwai suggested:
Check your /proc/asound/card0/codec97#0/ac97#0-0 file, whether it
contains "VRA" in Extended ID section. If not, it's 48k-only codec.
This is the case with both the test systems showing the problem here,
which both have AC97 on-board s
Hi Günter,
Just wanted to package this, but then I realized that
Debian testing already has version 0.2.20.
I've tried 0.2.20 but it shows the same behaviour. Is there a way I can
query the sample rate from libjack independently of qjackctl? That might
help narrow the problem down.
Cheers!
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Daniel James wrote:
> A new upstream version 0.2.20 is available:
>
> http://qjackctl.sourceforge.net/qjackctl-dl1.html
Just wanted to package this, but then I realized that
Debian testing already has version 0.2.20. Maybe updating
64studio packages helps ?
Let me know, I wou
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Daniel James wrote:
> However the original bug poster was using Debian i386, so it doesn't
> seem to be a 64 Studio or amd64 specific bug.
>
Hi,
I can't reproduce the bug here, I am on Debian unstable, same jack
libraries. I am pretty clueless as to what could be the problem
Hi Rui,
QjackCtl GUI reports sample-rate as read from jack_get_sample_rate() as
client of libjack. It just seems that jackd (server) is running at one SR
(44k1) and the libjack client interface is reporting the default one
(48k). Looks like a jackd/libjack implementation/deployment specific
issu
On Tue, August 22, 2006 12:20, Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Günter,
>
>
> I can confirm this bug. It does not seem to affect the sample rate of
> jackd, only the display of the sample rate within the qjackctl GUI. You can
> see this in the attached screenshot, where jackd is running at 44100 Hz
> but t
Hi Günter,
I can confirm this bug. It does not seem to affect the sample rate of
jackd, only the display of the sample rate within the qjackctl GUI. You
can see this in the attached screenshot, where jackd is running at 44100
Hz but the GUI shows 48000 Hz. You can also see this wrong figure in
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel wrote:
> After clicking on start the server is aways started at 48000Hz.
> Changes in the setup window doesn't affect this.
Thats strange, changing samplerate works perfectly on my system.
There are several things you could do to help me find out
Package: qjackctlVersion: 0.2.19a-1Severity: important*** Please type your report below this line ***After clicking on start the server is aways started at 48000Hz.Changes in the setup window doesn't affect this.
If I want to make some recordings in another sample rates (41000Hz for example) it's n
11 matches
Mail list logo