On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:53:23PM -0500, James Vega wrote:
tag 379839 wontfix
thanks
It's OK for me to ignore the insufficient contrast introduced by more
supported color modes but please note that this bug report was initially
about a wrong color scheme.
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:35:47PM
severity 379839 normal
thanks,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:50:24PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
Hi, I noticed that the default color schema of vimdiff is wrong, since
added lines in one of the files are not visible because foreground and
background color are identical.
Since these stupid color
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:40:59PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:50:24PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
Hi, I noticed that the default color schema of vimdiff is wrong, since
added lines in one of the files are not visible because foreground and
background color are
tag 379839 wontfix
thanks
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:35:47PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:03:24AM -0500, James Vega wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:40:59PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:50:24PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
Hi, I noticed that
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:03:24AM -0500, James Vega wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:40:59PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:50:24PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
Hi, I noticed that the default color schema of vimdiff is wrong, since
added lines in one of the files are
Package: vim
Version: 1:7.0-035+1
Severity: minor
Hi, I noticed that the default color schema of vimdiff is wrong, since
added lines in one of the files are not visible because foreground and
background color are identical.
Try for example to open the attached files in vimdiff.
I also have to
6 matches
Mail list logo
