Bug#382505: We'd need to update the upstream docs also

2006-09-05 Thread Michael(tm) Smith
If you were to change the Debian docbook-xsl package such that it uses /etc/papersize as a default papersize instead of using letter, as the upstream docs say, then you run the risk of a users discovering that every time they generate FO output, they are getting a different default thatn what the

Bug#382505: We'd need to update the upstream docs also

2006-09-05 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 05.09.2006, 16:30 +0900 schrieb Michael(tm) Smith: If you were to change the Debian docbook-xsl package such that it uses /etc/papersize as a default papersize instead of using letter, as the upstream docs say, then you run the risk of a users discovering that every time they

Bug#382505: We'd need to update the upstream docs also

2006-09-05 Thread Michael(tm) Smith
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2006-09-05 15:23 +0200: I thought about simply patching the docs in the debian package along with the param.xsl adding a notes That assumes the users actually have installed docbook-xsl-doc and that they are reading it instead of say, simply reading them over

Bug#382505: We'd need to update the upstream docs also

2006-09-05 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Mittwoch, den 06.09.2006, 00:59 +0900 schrieb Michael(tm) Smith: Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2006-09-05 15:23 +0200: [Should the workaround be mentioned in upstream docs?] See above. Don't put anything system specific into the docs. It's also possible, that one day this patch will

Bug#382505: We'd need to update the upstream docs also

2006-09-05 Thread Michael(tm) Smith
Hi Daniel, I could simply add a note [1] to the xsl:message, where you (upstream) output, which format is used (fo/docbook.xsl - root.messages). IMHO this is enough to make users aware of this little workaround. [1] E.g.: See /usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl/README.Debian for more information.