On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:55:02PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I agree with the bug reporter, then. A package of the importance of shadow
should desserve a test suite which would prevent the package building when
something's going wrong. Even if it's called unstable, the day I won't be
retitle 38909 [TO CLOSE 20050512] add shellutils grave bug to regression test
suite
thanks
Something went wrong with debhelper or something like that, and the
result was that /bin/su ended up having mode 755 instead of 4755.
Oops! So suddenly, /bin/su didn't work. The suggestion in this
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:14:37AM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
I had a look at this bug.
It seems to me that su was once installed not-suid root, and the submitter
forwarded a mail from an user who proposed to add a check for this in the
testsuite (see ltp-* packages).
I don't know who
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:31:51AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
retitle 38909 [TO CLOSE 20050512] add shellutils grave bug to regression test
suite
thanks
Something went wrong with debhelper or something like that, and the
result was that /bin/su ended up having mode 755 instead of
I agree with the bug reporter, then. A package of the importance of shadow
should desserve a test suite which would prevent the package building when
something's going wrong. Even if it's called unstable, the day I won't be
able to log onto my machine for one whole day, I'll get *mad*.
One
5 matches
Mail list logo
