On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:33:27PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
I am reading the online HTML version at
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/index.en.html
I hope it's the one you're referring to...
Yep, that's the one.
Fine, I see that it has a version
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:44:56 +0200 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:33:27PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Fine, I see that it has a version number in the footer (currently
3.9): should I go on mentioning *that* number in the Version:
pseudo-header of
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 07:35:28PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
if you could foolproof the full manual I would really appreciate it
Well, I'm (slowly) reading it and I am reporting bugs whenever I see
something that doesn't look right...
I don't know if that fits your definition of
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:58:56 +0200 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 07:35:28PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
if you could foolproof the full manual I would really appreciate
it
Well, I'm (slowly) reading it and I am reporting bugs whenever I see
something
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:29:23 +0200 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:29:45PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
There seems to be a little typo in section 9.1 _Best practices
for security review and design_:
[...]
This has been fixed in CVS and in the 3.9
Package: harden-doc
Version: 3.8
Severity: minor
Hi!
There seems to be a little typo in section 9.1 _Best practices
for security review and design_:
the cost in this later phase is sixty sixty times higher
The word sixty is repeated twice.
I think the fix should be
s/sixty sixty/sixty/
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:29:45PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
Hi!
Hi there.
There seems to be a little typo in section 9.1 _Best practices
for security review and design_:
the cost in this later phase is sixty sixty times higher
This has been fixed in CVS and in the 3.9 version I
7 matches
Mail list logo
