On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:13:43AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
please test the packages at
http://people.debian.org/~fs/ia32-libs/
the ia32-libs-gtk package contains libglib2.0-0, so it is needed too for
wine.
They're ok. wine runs and all the linker dependencies of its
Hi!
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:27:00AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
They're ok. wine runs and all the linker dependencies of its plugins are
satisfied.
Great :)
I'll upload today.
Btw please next time think of signing them (.dsc is enough). I don't like
installing unsigned stuff, even if
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:46:58PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:27:00AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
They're ok. wine runs and all the linker dependencies of its plugins are
satisfied.
Great :)
I'll upload today.
Finally! Thank you.
--
Robert
Hello,
please test the packages at
http://people.debian.org/~fs/ia32-libs/
the ia32-libs-gtk package contains libglib2.0-0, so it is needed too for
wine.
Additionally, the ia32-libs-gtk package was built using the unstable
version of libpango1.0-0 which includes the fix for #406455.
If both
Ok, it seems it's hopeless to think we can get ia32-libs-dev in time
for etch, as we need to wait for a new glibc upload before (see #407540).
I propose that we add the missing libs in ia32-libs _for runtime_ (patch
attached), and then build a wine package for amd64 in the same dirty way like
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:33:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
If we now have something substantial to put into ia32-libs-dev I see
no reason not to resurrect it. We do have some *.so symlinks
already. Including the symlinks for *.so files in ia32-libs is
somewhat broken as they lack the
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uhm sorry. libSM was enough to *build* and get a wine binary that works.
But to
get all the features you need one more pack of libraries.
I'm providing a patch for all of them. In addition, we also need libicu36-dev
but unfortunately the
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 03:30:12PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I was wondering how it comes that you don't need the -dev packages of
all the other libs.
Because the only component we need from them are *.so symlinks (headers are
provided by the 64-bit version of the *-dev packages).
Uhm sorry. libSM was enough to *build* and get a wine binary that works. But
to
get all the features you need one more pack of libraries.
I'm providing a patch for all of them. In addition, we also need libicu36-dev
but unfortunately the ia32-libs-dev package in which it would belong is only
Oops. Wrong path for libusb. Here is it again :)
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:19:56AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Uhm sorry. libSM was enough to *build* and get a wine binary that works.
But to
get all the features you need one more pack of libraries.
I'm providing a patch for all of
10 matches
Mail list logo
