reopen 395054 !
tag 395054 +wontfix
thanks
Around Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:33:49 -0800
Don Armstrong wrote (caps added):
Since the original issue behind this report has been resolved, and the
secondary issue isn't one I think is a bug (OR AM INTERESTED IN fixing
IF IT IS), I'm closing this bug.
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 22:05:22 -0800
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...It's a question of how much logging and recording
is enough, too much, or too little. I don't know if there's a
general answer, but I know how to scratch where it itches...
Again, the bug log keeps the original
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:10:13 -0800
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems like a useful message that belongs in the bug log. If
that's the only problem, then perhaps this bug should be changed to
to a 'wishlist' bug and retitled Improvement: add reopen email
control message to BTS
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006, A. Costa wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:10:13 -0800
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems like a useful message that belongs in the bug log. If
that's the only problem, then perhaps this bug should be changed to
to a 'wishlist' bug and retitled
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006, A. Costa wrote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:57:08 -0700 Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The message above *is* the reopen indication; you got sent an ack
from parsing that control mail.
That's confusing since that URL points to this text:
It should have been #11;
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:57:08 -0700
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=394813#13
I'd received that and also seen it on the BTS, but as you say
there's no reopen 'ack', just a you closed it message.
The message above *is* the reopen
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:58:18 -0700
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'd missed an emailed reopen 'ack', it should be on the BTS page
for #394813 somewhere...
The acks don't show up on the BTS; all you see is the effect of the
message to control, which is there:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, A. Costa wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:58:18 -0700 Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'd missed an emailed reopen 'ack', it should be on the BTS page
for #394813 somewhere...
The acks don't show up on the BTS; all you see is the effect of the
message to
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: important
A bug gets closed. I reopen it, or attempt to. The BTS replies with a
message claiming that it was closed by me. For full details, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=394813
This is doubly confusing:
1) I did not close
9 matches
Mail list logo
