LC == Luca Capello [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LC BTW, as the dependency is there, I'd remove the duplicated
LC suggestion for the same packages:
I think it should be there. If one uses both cmucl and sbcl while CLX
is installed only for one of them, this is the only hint from the
c == commi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
c I work with sbcl and was wanting to have a look at the sample
c apps that come in cl-mcclim-examples.
c When evaluating (asdf:operate 'asdf:load-op :clim-clx) i got the
c following error:
c component :CLX not found, required by
So the dependency is actually there. It's not
perfect but I don't know about any better way that would satisfy both
SBCL and CMUCL users.
Yes, i understand that the sbcl and cmucl lisp implementation seem to differ
significantly in this area.
Is this OK or do you have any suggestion how
Hello!
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:04:41 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
c == commi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it possible to include a dependency on that package in the
spec file of cl-mcclim-examples for users which have sbcl
installed?
cl-mcclim-examples recommends cl-mcclim which, in a bit
Package: cl-mcclim-examples
Version: 0.9.2.dfsg.1-1
Severity: normal
I work with sbcl and was wanting to have a look at the sample apps that come
in cl-mcclim-examples.
When evaluating (asdf:operate 'asdf:load-op :clim-clx) i got the following
error:
component :CLX not found, required by
5 matches
Mail list logo