Package: fail2ban
Version: 0.7.4-3
Severity: minor
The NEWS.Debian for the recent changes refers to
/etc/defaults/fail2ban. I think that's a typo, and
/etc/default/fail2ban is intended.
I think even with that correction, the current description is somewhat
confusing. First, it mixes a file
Hi Ross,
Thank you for taking a moment to help me with this NEWS entry.
The NEWS.Debian for the recent changes refers to
/etc/defaults/fail2ban. I think that's a typo, and
/etc/default/fail2ban is intended.
indeed... and 10:31:15 seems to be not that late an night, so I am not
sure how that
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:46:48PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Hi Ross,
Thank you for taking a moment to help me with this NEWS entry.
The NEWS.Debian for the recent changes refers to
/etc/defaults/fail2ban. I think that's a typo, and
/etc/default/fail2ban is intended.
indeed...
...
I have a feeling policy may frown on rewriting NEWS or changelogs
after the fact, but this certainly seems like a good case in which to
do so. The only possible drawback I can see is that people who
upgraded and got the old NEWS will not get the new NEWS (if they use
apt-listchanges).
Actually I adjusted postinst message to be
WARNING!
Fail2ban 0.7 is a complete rewrite of the 0.6 version, and if
you customized any of provided configuration or startup files
(/etc/default/fail2ban, /etc/fail2ban.conf, /etc/init.d/fail2ban),
please read relevant entry in
5 matches
Mail list logo
