Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Considering AUCTeX upstream wishes, I'm for the second: I don't think
>> there's much to gain by splitting the packages[*], so I think we should
>> just promote the Recommends to Depends.
>
> I agree
"Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Considering AUCTeX upstream wishes, I'm for the second: I don't think
> there's much to gain by splitting the packages[*], so I think we should
> just promote the Recommends to Depends.
I agree.
> Wheter we should add versioned Depends on prev
> fant == Frank Küster [2007-1-25]
fant> The question is: Is there a significant number of users who have
fant> installed preview-latex in sarge as an Emacs extension "just to
fant> look at it", but without having teTeX installed?
The original rationale for Recommends rather than Depends was
severity 408227 important
thanks
"Thomas Renard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 24.1.2007 schrieb "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>The content (or lack thereof) of
>>
>> /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex/CompilationLog*
>>
>
> got it: latex is missing on my machine
Am 24.1.2007 schrieb "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>The content (or lack thereof) of
>
> /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex/CompilationLog*
>
got it: latex is missing on my machine. Hm, does auctex need a dependency
for tetex?
After installing tetex-bin auctex compile
> RF == Romain Francoise [2007-1-24]
RF> Side note: could you please change auctex's install script so that
RF> it mentions this file name on the console if compilation fails?
Yes, that's a good idea, let us note it here (so that I will remember to
try and add it).
RF> I think it's importan
"Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex/CompilationLog*
Side note: could you please change auctex's install script so that
it mentions this file name on the console if compilation fails?
I think it's important for users to know where to loo
The content (or lack thereof) of
/usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex/CompilationLog*
would be particularly useful.
Note (to myself and people working on this bug): the Emacs byte
compilation log file should have been collected automatically by
reportbug (it seems reportbug or equiv
Thomas Renard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I deinstalled auctex and reinstalled emacs-snapshot-gtk and the
> compilation of emacs-snapshot-gtk worked without problems.
>
> Then I installed auctex again and the installation ended up with:
>
> install/auctex: Setting up for emacs-snapshot... emacs-p
"Thomas Renard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --RWP_PART_baer1169644315
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="emacs-snapshot.L12595"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="emacs-snapshot.L12595"
>
>
>
> --RWP_PART_baer1169644315--
There's nothing
>
>Could you please send us the whole log file? The message quoted
>above just says that it failed, it doesn't say why.
>
O course, sorry (I lost the old one so I reinstalled emacs again - but it
has the same output).
Thomas
emacs-snapshot.L12595
Description: Binary data
Hi,
Thomas Renard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /tmp/emacs-snapshot. output:
> install/auctex: Setting up for emacs-snapshot... emacs-install:
> /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex emacs-snapshot emacs21
> failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-install line 28, line
> 39.
Coul
Package: auctex
Version: 11.83-4
Severity: normal
When updating emacs-snapshot-gtk to 20070122-1 the compilation fails
when the auctex package is compiled.
/tmp/emacs-snapshot. output:
install/auctex: Setting up for emacs-snapshot... emacs-install:
/usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/au
13 matches
Mail list logo
