Bug#413784: Patch for the 0.9.10-16.1 NMU of sugarplum

2008-04-23 Thread Christian Perrier
Dear maintainer of sugarplum, On 11 Apr 2008 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to upload a NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial notice sent on 26 Mar 2008. You either agreed for this NMU or did not respond to my notices. I will now upload this NMU to

Bug#413784: Patch for the 0.9.10-16.1 NMU of sugarplum

2008-04-23 Thread sean finney
hi christian, On Tuesday 22 April 2008 07:52:27 pm Christian Perrier wrote: On 11 Apr 2008 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to upload a NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial notice sent on 26 Mar 2008. and i responded, saying i had already done this

Bug#413784: Patch for the 0.9.10-16.1 NMU of sugarplum

2008-04-23 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): hi christian, On Tuesday 22 April 2008 07:52:27 pm Christian Perrier wrote: On 11 Apr 2008 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to upload a NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial notice sent on 26 Mar 2008. and