* Olafur Jens Sigurdsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-17 13:02]:
I must say that I dont understand this bug report, it doesnt say
anything specific about what is wrong with the package.
The only problem I have with version 2.9.10 is that it does not
include the path to the forge functions and
* John W. Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-10 15:18]:
I think this is unfortunate since Octave is useful on its own without
Octave Forge and I think 2.9.10 is much better than 2.9.9.
A not-so-unrelated question: currently, the virtual package called octave
in Debian depends on octave2.1.
On 10-Apr-2007, Thomas Weber wrote:
| Package: octave2.9
| Version: 2.9.10-4
| Severity: grave
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| Octave 2.9.10 doesn't play well with the current octave2.9-forge packages in
| Debian, so it shouldn't enter testing in the current state.
I think this
* John W. Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-10 15:18]:
On 10-Apr-2007, Thomas Weber wrote:
| Package: octave2.9
| Version: 2.9.10-4
| Severity: grave
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| Octave 2.9.10 doesn't play well with the current octave2.9-forge packages in
| Debian, so
4 matches
Mail list logo
