sbackup has been merged and superseded by nssbackup, which is not yet
in Debian. I will see if I can get a version properly suited to be
packaged in Debian, and I will ask sbackup to be removed from archive.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
it
Le Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:25:19AM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo a écrit :
sbackup has been merged and superseded by nssbackup, which is not yet
in Debian. I will see if I can get a version properly suited to be
packaged in Debian, and I will ask sbackup to be removed from archive.
Hi Jose,
Dear all,
it is almost one year that sbackup was modified to use a group ID that
exists on Ubuntu but not on Debian systems. As suggested on
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I have increased the severity of the bug to
'serious' three weeks ago. (#427697)
sbackup is a native Debian package whose maintainer is
NMU? The fix looks trivial...
pgp9RlA2CNcRY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
2008/5/15 Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Despite the fact that the maintainer of sbackup is actively blogging on
planet.d.o, I wonder if sbackup is maintained. From a user perspective
(and I am a user of sbackup, that is why I feel concerned), I think that
if there is no future for sbackup,
Le Fri, May 16, 2008 at 01:22:12AM +0300, Aigars Mahinovs a écrit :
The upstream situation is not as clear cut - I've been making every
effort to a new and enthusiastic developer (Ouattara Oumar Aziz) take
over the upstream development of SBackup peacefully.
I am discussing the future of
Forgot to cc the bug report. Apologies to anyone who gets this twice.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Bug#427697: Is sbackup maintained? If not, what to do?
Date: Friday 16 May 2008 13:07
From: Andrew Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 16 May 2008
7 matches
Mail list logo
