found 430380 2:0.9.2-3
thanks
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 12:28:03 pm Mark Purcell wrote:
tags 430380 moreinfo
tags 430380 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote:
I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380. But you
should be able to test this with
tags 430380 moreinfo
tags 430380 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote:
I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380. But you
should be able to test this with really any JPEG and see if it looks better.
John,
Have you confirmed that #430380 is
On Tue July 10 2007 12:28:03 pm Mark Purcell wrote:
tags 430380 moreinfo
tags 430380 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote:
I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380. But you
should be able to test this with really any JPEG and see if it looks
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, John Goerzen wrote:
Version: 2:0.9.2~beta3-1
Sometime after upgrading to 0.9.2, digikam got REALLY slow on big albums
-- or tags that selected lots of photos. top showed kio_digikamalbum
using resources, and stracing it revealed that it was reading every byte
of every
Package: digikam
Version: 2:0.9.2~beta3-1
Severity: important
Sometime after upgrading to 0.9.2, digikam got REALLY slow on big albums
-- or tags that selected lots of photos. top showed kio_digikamalbum
using resources, and stracing it revealed that it was reading every byte
of every file in
5 matches
Mail list logo