Bug#430380: digikam: REALLY slow on big albums

2007-07-19 Thread John Goerzen
found 430380 2:0.9.2-3 thanks On Tuesday 10 July 2007 12:28:03 pm Mark Purcell wrote: tags 430380 moreinfo tags 430380 unreproducible thanks On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote: I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380. But you should be able to test this with

Bug#430380: digikam: REALLY slow on big albums

2007-07-10 Thread Mark Purcell
tags 430380 moreinfo tags 430380 unreproducible thanks On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote: I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380. But you should be able to test this with really any JPEG and see if it looks better. John, Have you confirmed that #430380 is

Bug#430380: digikam: REALLY slow on big albums

2007-07-10 Thread John Goerzen
On Tue July 10 2007 12:28:03 pm Mark Purcell wrote: tags 430380 moreinfo tags 430380 unreproducible thanks On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote: I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380. But you should be able to test this with really any JPEG and see if it looks

Bug#430380: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#430380: digikam: REALLY slow on big albums

2007-06-25 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, John Goerzen wrote: Version: 2:0.9.2~beta3-1 Sometime after upgrading to 0.9.2, digikam got REALLY slow on big albums -- or tags that selected lots of photos. top showed kio_digikamalbum using resources, and stracing it revealed that it was reading every byte of every

Bug#430380: digikam: REALLY slow on big albums

2007-06-23 Thread John Goerzen
Package: digikam Version: 2:0.9.2~beta3-1 Severity: important Sometime after upgrading to 0.9.2, digikam got REALLY slow on big albums -- or tags that selected lots of photos. top showed kio_digikamalbum using resources, and stracing it revealed that it was reading every byte of every file in