James Troup schrieb:
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
merge 432644 432143
thanks
I just wanted to second these bug reports. gnus users are more likely
to want to move to emacs22 than the random emacs user, i would think.
It'd be good to get them compatible within debian, and the
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I hadn't noticed that gnus was shipped with emacs22. I've switched to
it now, and the only problem i'm having is that
message-insert-formated-citation-line doesn't appear to be present in
the gnus from emacs22, though it is available in the gnus package. If
that's th
Thanks for the quick response, James.
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFAICS the gnus in emacs22 is newer than either the current packaged
> version or ngnus-0.6. It's not obvious to me that allowing the gnus
> package to install with emacs22 before it's newer is a good idea.
I hadn't
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> merge 432644 432143
> thanks
>
> I just wanted to second these bug reports. gnus users are more likely
> to want to move to emacs22 than the random emacs user, i would think.
> It'd be good to get them compatible within debian, and the patch from
merge 432644 432143
thanks
I just wanted to second these bug reports. gnus users are more likely
to want to move to emacs22 than the random emacs user, i would think.
It'd be good to get them compatible within debian, and the patch from
432143 seems to work OK for me.
Thanks for keeping gnus in
5 matches
Mail list logo
