James Troup schrieb:
Daniel Kahn Gillmor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
merge 432644 432143
thanks
I just wanted to second these bug reports. gnus users are more likely
to want to move to emacs22 than the random emacs user, i would think.
It'd be good to get them compatible within debian, and the
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I hadn't noticed that gnus was shipped with emacs22. I've switched to
it now, and the only problem i'm having is that
message-insert-formated-citation-line doesn't appear to be present in
the gnus from emacs22, though it is available in the gnus package. If
that's
Daniel Kahn Gillmor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
merge 432644 432143
thanks
I just wanted to second these bug reports. gnus users are more likely
to want to move to emacs22 than the random emacs user, i would think.
It'd be good to get them compatible within debian, and the patch from
432143
Thanks for the quick response, James.
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFAICS the gnus in emacs22 is newer than either the current packaged
version or ngnus-0.6. It's not obvious to me that allowing the gnus
package to install with emacs22 before it's newer is a good idea.
I hadn't
merge 432644 432143
thanks
I just wanted to second these bug reports. gnus users are more likely
to want to move to emacs22 than the random emacs user, i would think.
It'd be good to get them compatible within debian, and the patch from
432143 seems to work OK for me.
Thanks for keeping gnus in
5 matches
Mail list logo