On Mon, Oct 22, 2007, Michael Biebl wrote:
according to lintian, the binary package should follow the soname and be
libgnomeui-2-0. Another possible name would be libgnomeui2-0, which
would be more in line with the current practice of naming gnome libs.
But libgnomeui-0 is definitely weird.
Am Montag, den 22.10.2007, 09:18 +0200 schrieb Loïc Minier:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007, Michael Biebl wrote:
according to lintian, the binary package should follow the soname and be
libgnomeui-2-0. Another possible name would be libgnomeui2-0, which
would be more in line with the current
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
So probably with Gnome 3.0 in a few years ;)
Renaming it now would be insane with all the rdeps, right :)
It's doable, simply keep a dummy package around and with some time, the
shlibs will make all deps move to the new name, but it's just
Package: libgnomeui-0
Version: 2.20.1.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
according to lintian, the binary package should follow the soname and be
libgnomeui-2-0. Another possible name would be libgnomeui2-0, which
would be more in line with the current practice of naming gnome libs.
But libgnomeui-0 is
4 matches
Mail list logo
