Bug#459524: rules for palm in udev.rules and z60_libpisock9.rules: why?

I'm probably wrong about the pilot udev rule - see this link for how it is explained to me. Something about using libusb vs using the kernel visor module. I was probably confusing the two methods and trying to do some of each.

Bug#459524: rules for palm in udev.rules and z60_libpisock9.rules: why?

There are two places where rules related to palm's exist: - udev.rules, where the symlink is created - z60_libpisock9.rules, where permissions and ownership is decided for the actual device nodes. udev.rules is owned by package udev.