Bug#462546: ipw3945-source: does not build with vanilla 2.6.24

2008-03-30 Thread Daniel Baumann
Ionut Ciocirlan wrote: > How is the iwl* license different from the old ipw*? It's the same story: > firmware is binary-only, the rest is GPL: > http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/LICENSE.iwlwifi-ucode err, ipw3945 requires a binary-only daemon. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse

Bug#462546: ipw3945-source: does not build with vanilla 2.6.24

2008-03-30 Thread Ionut Ciocirlan
> > So why an user can't choose to use ipw3945 instead of iwl3945? > > because ipw3945 is binary-only shit and dead upstream, just to name two > things. How is the iwl* license different from the old ipw*? It's the same story: firmware is binary-only, the rest is GPL: http://www.intellinuxwirel

Bug#462546: ipw3945-source: does not build with vanilla 2.6.24

2008-01-29 Thread Emilio Scalise
Yes I know perfectly. But it works better than iwl3945 for now. Until iwl3945 reaches the stability level of ipw3945 why you can't leave it? Encouraging more people to use iwl3945 is really good for it's development, as more people will find bugs. This is only, my opinion, perhaps. Bye, Emil

Bug#462546: ipw3945-source: does not build with vanilla 2.6.24

2008-01-29 Thread Daniel Baumann
Emilio Scalise wrote: > So why an user can't choose to use ipw3945 instead of iwl3945? because ipw3945 is binary-only shit and dead upstream, just to name two things. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://

Bug#462546: ipw3945-source: does not build with vanilla 2.6.24

2008-01-29 Thread Emilio Scalise
I don't think you should drop ipw3945 support completely, as it still compiles for 2.6.24 kernel with the patch that can be found here: http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20071223.025752.89232a4d.it.html The default should become iwl3945, but please leave at least for a while ipw3945. iwl3945 i

Bug#462546: ipw3945-source: does not build with vanilla 2.6.24

2008-01-25 Thread Daniel Baumann
Kiko Piris wrote: > Oh!, I wasn’t aware of that new driver. Cool to get rid of that ugly > (and not free) regulatory daemon (and the not free driver as well). no problem, so am i :) although iwlwifi is sometimes still a bit buggier than the 'old' ipw3945. but that will hopefully change soon. anyw

Bug#462546: ipw3945-source: does not build with vanilla 2.6.24

2008-01-25 Thread Kiko Piris
On 25/01/2008 at 17:04 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > use ipw3945 only on kernels <=2.6.22; from >=2.6.23 use iwlwifi. also > note, that as soon as 2.6.24 enters testing, ipw3945 will be removed. Oh!, I wasn’t aware of that new driver. Cool to get rid of that ugly (and not free) regulatory daemon

Bug#462546: ipw3945-source: does not build with vanilla 2.6.24

2008-01-25 Thread Daniel Baumann
Kiko Piris wrote: > When trying to build with make-kpkg modules_image in a up2date sid: use ipw3945 only on kernels <=2.6.22; from >=2.6.23 use iwlwifi. also note, that as soon as 2.6.24 enters testing, ipw3945 will be removed. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse

Bug#462546: ipw3945-source: does not build with vanilla 2.6.24

2008-01-25 Thread Kiko Piris
Package: ipw3945-source Version: 1.2.2-1 Severity: normal When trying to build with make-kpkg modules_image in a up2date sid: | # Build the module | /usr/bin/make modules KSRC=/usr/src/linux-2.6.24 KVER=2.6.24 | make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw3945' | mkdir -p /usr/src/modules/i