On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Santiago Vila [161011 01:35]:
> > As of today, lsb-base is "less essential" than before, because
> > util-linux no longer depends on it in stretch.
> >
> > Also, if I'm not mistaken, lsb-base is a shell library to be used by
> > init.d scrip
* Santiago Vila [161011 01:35]:
> As of today, lsb-base is "less essential" than before, because
> util-linux no longer depends on it in stretch.
>
> Also, if I'm not mistaken, lsb-base is a shell library to be used by
> init.d scripts, but those scripts are obsoleted by systemd.
They are obsole
Hello everybody.
As of today, lsb-base is "less essential" than before, because
util-linux no longer depends on it in stretch.
Also, if I'm not mistaken, lsb-base is a shell library to be used by
init.d scripts, but those scripts are obsoleted by systemd.
So, it is now possible (and in fact I do
Hi Russ, Raphael, Marc and dear Lintian maintainers,
Le 22.02.2009 05:46, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>> Now that lenny is out even oldstable (i.e. etch) has an lsb-base > 3.0-6
>> Am I right to assume that this bug should therefor be closed?
>
> No, the problem isn't the v
Raphael Geissert writes:
> Now that lenny is out even oldstable (i.e. etch) has an lsb-base > 3.0-6
> Am I right to assume that this bug should therefor be closed?
No, the problem isn't the version of lsb-base, it's that lsb-base isn't
essential and hence can't be assumed to be present without a
Hi everyone,
Now that lenny is out even oldstable (i.e. etch) has an lsb-base > 3.0-6
Am I right to assume that this bug should therefor be closed?
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debia
Hi
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:58:36 +0100
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, there are some packages which use something like this:
>
> if [ -f /lib/lsb/init-functions ]; then
> . /lib/lsb/init-functions
> fi
I didn't notice this so far. I just thought this would add too
Michal "=?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Ciha=C5=99?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> while reviewing some sponsored packages I noticed quite often mistake of
> missing dependency on lsb-base (>= 3.0-6) if init script includes
> /lib/lsb/init-functions. I think it would be reasonable to add such
> check to lintian -
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.45
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
while reviewing some sponsored packages I noticed quite often mistake of
missing dependency on lsb-base (>= 3.0-6) if init script includes
/lib/lsb/init-functions. I think it would be reasonable
9 matches
Mail list logo
