Bug#487955: reprepro: sub-components not handled properly

2008-06-25 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Package: reprepro Version: 3.5.1-1 Severity: normal Hi! I am trying to create a repository that would look like Debian's volatile or security repositories. Both uses Components like updates/main or volatile/main. Unfortunately, reprepro seems unable to handle such repositories. The normal

Bug#487955: reprepro: sub-components not handled properly

2008-06-25 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080625 14:24]: I am trying to create a repository that would look like Debian's volatile or security repositories. Both uses Components like updates/main or volatile/main. Unfortunately, reprepro seems unable to handle such repositories. The normal

Bug#487955: reprepro: sub-components not handled properly

2008-06-25 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:39:18PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: I think this is a hint that you want Codename: etch/updates Components: main instead. Doing this result in a Release file containing (indeed): Codename: etch/updates Components: main This diverges slightly from Release

Bug#487955: reprepro: sub-components not handled properly

2008-06-25 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080625 15:29]: Doing this result in a Release file containing (indeed): Codename: etch/updates Components: main This diverges slightly from Release files in security or volatile repositories: Codename: etch Components: updates/main updates/contrib

Bug#487955: reprepro: sub-components not handled properly

2008-06-25 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:48:49PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: * Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080625 15:29]: Doing this result in a Release file containing (indeed): Codename: etch/updates Components: main This diverges slightly from Release files in security or volatile

Bug#487955: reprepro: sub-components not handled properly

2008-06-25 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080625 16:22]: and this tends to trigger APT warnings for codename mismatch. Hm, that must have changed (though already some time ago). Looks like apt was changed to the inconsistent naming of security instead of the other way around... Sigh...