> > Shouldn't rather libgts-dev be fixed to include the gts-config binary?
>
> This would be the better thing to do, yes. But while gts-config is
> provided by libgts-bin and while we are on freeze (maybe the release
> team thinks that it is a "too disruptive" change), it isn't all wrong
> to depe
Hi Michael!
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:05:16 +0200
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if this is the right fix :
>
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), libgts-dev (>> 0.7.3),
> libglib2.0-dev, autotools-dev
> +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), libgts-dev (>> 0.7.3),
> libglib2.0-
Hi,
I'm wondering if this is the right fix :
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), libgts-dev (>> 0.7.3), libglib2.0-dev,
autotools-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), libgts-dev (>> 0.7.3), libglib2.0-dev,
autotools-dev, libgts-bin
Shouldn't rather libgts-dev be fixed to include the gts-config b
3 matches
Mail list logo