Bug#494243: bug #494243: Is this the right fix?

2008-08-28 Thread Ruben Molina
> > Shouldn't rather libgts-dev be fixed to include the gts-config binary? > > This would be the better thing to do, yes. But while gts-config is > provided by libgts-bin and while we are on freeze (maybe the release > team thinks that it is a "too disruptive" change), it isn't all wrong > to depe

Bug#494243: bug #494243: Is this the right fix?

2008-08-28 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi Michael! On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:05:16 +0200 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm wondering if this is the right fix : > > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), libgts-dev (>> 0.7.3), > libglib2.0-dev, autotools-dev > +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), libgts-dev (>> 0.7.3), > libglib2.0-

Bug#494243: bug #494243: Is this the right fix?

2008-08-28 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, I'm wondering if this is the right fix : -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), libgts-dev (>> 0.7.3), libglib2.0-dev, autotools-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), libgts-dev (>> 0.7.3), libglib2.0-dev, autotools-dev, libgts-bin Shouldn't rather libgts-dev be fixed to include the gts-config b