Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 06:28:05PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
>
>> Are you interested in a dpkg.log or some aptitude status files? I can
>> recover them from backup for a couple of days.
>
> I've been thinking about
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 06:28:05PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> severity 495954 critical
> thanks
>
> This bug "makes unrelated software on the system break". Well,
> aptitude is a package manager, so most of its bugs do...
>
> Are you interested in a dpkg.log or
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:36:44AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 02:13:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - On package upgrade, the preinst script of the new package is called
> > *before* the prerm of the old package.
> Policy section 6.6 says the other way around.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 02:13:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> - On package upgrade, the preinst script of the new package is called
> *before* the prerm of the old package.
Policy section 6.6 says the other way around.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:30:14PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
>> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> 2. A typescript of the upgrade with "-o Debug::pkgDpkgPM=true"
>>>added (both to get more debu
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 02:41:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Other comments:
> As for the claim that this is an apt bug instead of an aptitude bug:
>
> > I think it pretty much confirms this: particularly the fact that
> > aptitude believes that it's installi
Other comments:
> It seems that this may not always be possible, for instance when the old
> version of the upgraded package was not configured.
Yes, that's correct; if the old version of slapd had been deconfigured,
there is no guarantee from policy that its dependencies will remain
installed.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:43:17PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > Well, it's an aptitude bug, so doing so. The dependencies of the old
> > version of the package *must* still be installed when the preinst of the new
> > package is being run, because the new-preinst is called by dpkg in the phase
>
On 2008-08-21 23:38 +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reassign 495954 aptitude
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:24:01PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 05:18:50PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> >> I upgraded a machine f
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:30:14PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 2. A typescript of the upgrade with "-o Debug::pkgDpkgPM=true"
> >added (both to get more debugging information and to see what
> >happ
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 06:28:05PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
>> severity 495954 critical
>> thanks
>>
>> This bug "makes unrelated software on the system break". Well,
>> aptitude is a package manager, so most of it
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 06:28:05PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> severity 495954 critical
> thanks
>
> This bug "makes unrelated software on the system break". Well,
> aptitude is a package manager, so most of its bugs do...
>
> Are you interested in a dpkg.log or
severity 495954 critical
thanks
This bug "makes unrelated software on the system break". Well,
aptitude is a package manager, so most of its bugs do...
Are you interested in a dpkg.log or some aptitude status files? I can
recover them from backup for a couple of days.
--
Regards,
Feri.
--
reassign 495954 aptitude
thanks
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:24:01PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 05:18:50PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> >> I upgraded a machine from Etch to Lenny, and hit a problem with slapd:
> >> Prepari
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 05:18:50PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> I upgraded a machine from Etch to Lenny, and hit a problem with slapd:
>>
>> Preparing to replace slapd 2.3.30-5+etch1 (using
>> .../slapd_2.4.10-3_i386.deb) ...
>> Dumping to /var/b
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 05:18:50PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Package: slapd
> Version: 2.3.30-5+etch1
> Severity: normal
> I upgraded a machine from Etch to Lenny, and hit a problem with slapd:
> Preparing to replace slapd 2.3.30-5+etch1 (using .../slapd_2.4.10-3_i386.deb)
> ...
> Dumping
Package: slapd
Version: 2.3.30-5+etch1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I upgraded a machine from Etch to Lenny, and hit a problem with slapd:
Preparing to replace slapd 2.3.30-5+etch1 (using .../slapd_2.4.10-3_i386.deb)
...
Dumping to /var/backups/slapd-2.3.30-5+etch1:
- directory dc=aai,dc=niif,dc=h
17 matches
Mail list logo
