Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-24 Thread Eric Valette
Loïc Minier wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008, Eric Valette wrote: > >> 4 r-ptxp-ceva6380:/tmp/toto->echo "text" >> AA1-XXxxxé >> > > Your shell is creating invalid UTF-8 filenames; when you do something > like: > % export LANG=foobar > % echo "foo" >somefilename-with-8bits-ch

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-24 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008, Eric Valette wrote: > 4 r-ptxp-ceva6380:/tmp/toto->echo "text" >> AA1-XXxxxé Your shell is creating invalid UTF-8 filenames; when you do something like: % export LANG=foobar % echo "foo" >somefilename-with-8bits-chars the bytes you send to your shell over y

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-24 Thread Eric Valette
Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 24 décembre 2008 à 10:24 +0100, Eric Valette a écrit : > >> 2 r-ptxp-ceva6380:~->mkdir /tmp/toto >> 3 r-ptxp-ceva6380:~->cd /tmp/toto >> 4 r-ptxp-ceva6380:/tmp/toto->echo "text" >> AA1-XXxxxé >> 5 r-ptxp-ceva6380:/tmp/toto->export LANG=fr_FR.utf8 >>

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 24 décembre 2008 à 10:24 +0100, Eric Valette a écrit : > 2 r-ptxp-ceva6380:~->mkdir /tmp/toto > 3 r-ptxp-ceva6380:~->cd /tmp/toto > 4 r-ptxp-ceva6380:/tmp/toto->echo "text" >> AA1-XXxxxé > 5 r-ptxp-ceva6380:/tmp/toto->export LANG=fr_FR.utf8 > 6 r-ptxp-ceva6380:/tmp/toto->icedove

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-24 Thread Eric Valette
Josselin Mouette wrote: > >> Plus, unless I missed something, you are wrong I send example with >> lang=fr...@utf8 set and the bug still happens. See message #29. >> > > It is not my problem either if you think a '@' and a '.' are the same > characters. When I mean 'fr_FR.UTF-8', I don’t me

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
severity 509582 important thanks Le mardi 23 décembre 2008 à 21:07 +0100, Eric Valette a écrit : > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > Which unrelated software does it break? > > Using the same kind of argument because a program use libc and libc is > broken (e.g bad code in a specific function), is i

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-23 Thread Eric Valette
Josselin Mouette wrote: > Which unrelated software does it break? Using the same kind of argument because a program use libc and libc is broken (e.g bad code in a specific function), is is not a critical bug because all program are supposed to use libc? > Fine. And if your system doesn’t work c

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-23 Thread Eric Valette
Eric Valette wrote: > Loïc Minier wrote: > >> Ok, so if it's only in combination with the experimental libc, or with >> an explicit MALLOC_CHECK_=2 export, it's fine to lower the severity a >> little; this still is either important or serious. > > Sure. One more comment: you do not see the *e

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 23 décembre 2008 à 19:47 +0100, Eric Valette a écrit : > > 2) This bug is not critical. This severity means “breaks the whole > > system” or “root security hole”. This bug: > > NO NO NO: breaks unrelated software. Look at the criteria given using > reportbug! Which unrelated software doe

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-23 Thread Eric Valette
Loïc Minier wrote: > Ok, so if it's only in combination with the experimental libc, or with > an explicit MALLOC_CHECK_=2 export, it's fine to lower the severity a > little; this still is either important or serious. Sure. > Right, but these aren't completely unrelated in that they use thi

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-23 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi On Tue, Dec 23, 2008, Eric Valette wrote: > NO NO NO Cool down > > * only occurs on systems with legacy locale settings > > * doesn’t occur all the time, unless you are always using > > MALLOC_CHECK_=2 > On experimental libc, apprently this is default. I do not se

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-23 Thread Eric Valette
Eric Valette wrote: > Josselin Mouette wrote: >> Le mardi 23 décembre 2008 à 18:52 +0100, Eric Valette a écrit : >>> Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity >>> while not responding to problem >> 1) I am one of the maintainers. >

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-23 Thread Eric Valette
Eric Valette wrote: > Josselin Mouette wrote: >> 1) I am one of the maintainers. Fix the packages maintainer page then. You are not listed! --eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-23 Thread Eric Valette
Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 23 décembre 2008 à 18:52 +0100, Eric Valette a écrit : >> Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity >> while not responding to problem > > 1) I am one of the maintainers. > 2) This bug is not critical. This se

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 23 décembre 2008 à 18:52 +0100, Eric Valette a écrit : > Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity > while not responding to problem 1) I am one of the maintainers. 2) This bug is not critical. This severity means “breaks the whole system” or “root se

Bug#509582: still puszed how a non maintainer handled the criticity while not responding to problem

2008-12-23 Thread Eric Valette
severity 509582 critical -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org