Hello,
I don't get any answer since 6 weeks. So I close this bug.
CU
Jörg
--
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key: 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56
Old (will be revoked after 2014-12-31):
pgp Fingerprint:
tags 525524 + moreinfo - patch
thanks
Hello,
sane-backends release 1.0.24-3 is now in testing.
Please can you check whether the same bug still exists?
CU
Jörg
--
pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E
pgp Key: BE581B6E
CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56
Jörg
Has there been any progress on this? A similar bug was filed under
Ubuntu's sane-backends project back in 2007 (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/83957), with
multiple confirmations as recent as March 2012 and no work towards a
solution. I've had the same problem for
On Sunday 07 November 2010 17:13:04 Gerhard Jäger wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 06 November 2010 22:29:38 Stefan Champailler wrote:
[...]
any news on that? Can you confirm the settings?
ooops RL caught me... But thanks to your mail, I've made some tests
tonight. Excerpts of the code
On Thursday 04 November 2010 22:03:19 Gerhard Jäger wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Tuesday 27 July 2010 00:00:52 Stefan Champailler wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010 19:52:33 Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
well I've two different N650U and they both work with the old
settings and I had nobody like you wiht a
On Tuesday 27 July 2010 00:00:52 Stefan Champailler wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010 19:52:33 Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
well I've two different N650U and they both work with the old
settings and I had nobody like you wiht a N656 to test that's all...
Anyway thanks for testing, I'll commit (is it
Hi Stefan, hi Julien,
On Sunday 25 July 2010 16:19:46 Julien BLACHE wrote:
Stefan Champailler schampail...@skynet.be wrote:
Hi Stefan, Gerhard,
[Canon N656U]
I used the scanner again with success... However, not the kind of success
one
may have hoped for. Lemme explain... First, as
Maybe Gerhard knows something about this. In the end, it may just
vibrations due to different motor settings between SANE and the Windows
driver.
your guess is right. While playing with different settings, the grinding
noise was my partner - and as you now observe sometimes this ghost
On Monday 26 July 2010 15:58:10 Stefan Champailler wrote:
Maybe Gerhard knows something about this. In the end, it may just
vibrations due to different motor settings between SANE and the Windows
driver.
your guess is right. While playing with different settings, the grinding
noise
On Monday 26 July 2010 16:10:52 Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010 15:58:10 Stefan Champailler wrote:
Maybe Gerhard knows something about this. In the end, it may just
vibrations due to different motor settings between SANE and the
Windows driver.
your guess is right.
On Monday 26 July 2010 16:10:52 Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010 15:58:10 Stefan Champailler wrote:
Maybe Gerhard knows something about this. In the end, it may just
vibrations due to different motor settings between SANE and the
Windows driver.
Tested these :
hep,
Just checked my test an d the resolution are fine : 200dpi is really 200 dpi...
Good to know :-)
stF
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Monday 26 July 2010 17:20:34 Stefan Champailler wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010 16:10:52 Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010 15:58:10 Stefan Champailler wrote:
Maybe Gerhard knows something about this. In the end, it may just
vibrations due to different motor settings
Gerhard Jaeger gerh...@gjaeger.de wrote:
Hi,
Anyway thanks for testing, I'll commit (is it the same wording as for
CVs?) the patch ASAP.
Yes :) If you need any help, let me know.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE jbla...@debian.org | Debian, because code matters more
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
On Monday 26 July 2010 19:52:33 Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
well I've two different N650U and they both work with the old
settings and I had nobody like you wiht a N656 to test that's all...
Anyway thanks for testing, I'll commit (is it the same wording as for
CVs?) the patch ASAP.
Hey not so
On Saturday 23 May 2009 17:15:45 Julien BLACHE wrote:
Stefan schampaillers...@skynet.be wrote:
Hi Stefan,
My scanner is CanoScan N656U.
I use debian lenny on a iBook G4 and on a standard recent Intel-base
desktop.
This may have been fixed in libsane 1.0.20, if you can give it a
Stefan Champailler schampail...@skynet.be wrote:
Hi Stefan, Gerhard,
[Canon N656U]
I used the scanner again with success... However, not the kind of success one
may have hoped for. Lemme explain... First, as a last chance effort, I've
switch to debian testing. The scanner just behaves like
Stefan schampaillers...@skynet.be wrote:
Hi Stefan,
My scanner is CanoScan N656U.
I use debian lenny on a iBook G4 and on a standard recent Intel-base
desktop.
This may have been fixed in libsane 1.0.20, if you can give it a
try. If you need backported packages for Lenny, chances are they'll
On Saturday 25 April 2009 11:30:56 Julien BLACHE wrote:
Stefan schampaillers...@skynet.be wrote:
Hi,
The scanner was working on my PPC when I was using Etch so it seems like
a regression somewhere.
Could you:
- test the scanner with known-good software?
- test again with a
Package: libsane
Version: 1.0.19-23
Severity: important
My scanner is CanoScan N656U.
I use debian lenny on a iBook G4 and on a standard recent Intel-base
desktop.
The scanner is properly detected :
ste...@debian:~$ lsusb
Bus 008 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 004
Stefan schampaillers...@skynet.be wrote:
Hi,
The scanner was working on my PPC when I was using Etch so it seems like
a regression somewhere.
Could you:
- test the scanner with known-good software?
- test again with a known-good version of libsane?
If both work fine, try the current SANE
21 matches
Mail list logo
