Hi,
At Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:21:09 +0200,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:09:25AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I'm more inclined to make advi mandatory than allowing users to use
> > xdvi with whizzytex. Why would you want to use xdvi?
>
> Well, because I'm used to it
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:09:25AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I'm more inclined to make advi mandatory than allowing users to use
> xdvi with whizzytex. Why would you want to use xdvi?
Well, because I'm used to it and because it is the standard DVI viewer
of TeXlive and TeTeX. Why should I ins
Hi,
I'm more inclined to make advi mandatory than allowing users to use
xdvi with whizzytex. Why would you want to use xdvi?
At Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:37:20 +0200,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> Package: whizzytex
> Version: 1.3.1-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> What the user gets out of the box by ins
Package: whizzytex
Version: 1.3.1-3
Severity: wishlist
What the user gets out of the box by installing whizzytex is not
(necessarily) working, because whizzytex default configuration relies
on advi which is not necessarily installed.
While it is totally reasonable not to require advi as a depende
4 matches
Mail list logo
